Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05614
Original file (BC 2013 05614.txt) Auto-classification: Approved
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:		DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2013-05614	
  (DECEASED)			COUNSEL:  NONE
  (APPLICANT)			HEARING DESIRED:  NO


APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

She be designated as the former spouse beneficiary under the 
decedent’s Reserve Component Survivor’s Benefit Plan (RCSBP).  


APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

The RCSBP costs were deducted from the decedent’s pay until his 
death; however, the benefits will not be paid due to a missing 
form which needs to be filed to change the designated 
beneficiary from spouse to former spouse.

She was the listed beneficiary until the time of his death.  

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A.


STATEMENT OF FACTS:

On 4 Jul 65, the parties were married.

According to a divorce decree issued by the Commonwealth of 
Massachusetts, docket number 87D0621-D1, the parties divorced on 
30 Jun 87.  The divorce decree is silent on SBP but includes a 
signed, notarized statement dated 11 Apr 87 from the decedent 
that he would keep all insurance in force with the applicant as 
the beneficiary.  

According to a certificate of death issued by the Commonwealth 
of Massachusetts, the service member died on 28 Jun 11.  His 
death certificate reflects he was not married at the time of his 
death.

In an e-mail dated 14 Jan 15, DFAS-CL confirmed a refund of SBP 
cost in the amount of $6830.18 for the period of premiums paid 
29 Jun 05 through 29 Jun 11 was issued to the applicant, the 
designated beneficiary.  


AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPFFF recommends approval.  There is no evidence of Air 
Force error in this case and absent a competing claimant, DPFFF 
recommends the decedent’s record be corrected to reflect that on 
1 Jul 87, he elected to change RCSBP spouse to former spouse 
coverage based on full retired pay, naming the applicant as the 
eligible beneficiary.  Approval should be contingent upon 
recovery of any applicable premiums.
As background, a person’s eligibility to receive a spouse SBP 
annuity terminates upon divorce.  However, the law provides two 
mechanisms for changing spouse coverage to former spouse 
coverage.  One of the following actions must be taken within the 
first year following divorce: (1) the retiree may file an 
election change, or (2) the former spouse may request the 
retiree be deemed to have made such a change on his or her 
behalf.  In the latter case, the former spouse must provide 
legal documentation the member agreed, or the court ordered the 
member to establish former spouse coverage.  If neither the 
member nor the former spouse requests the election change during 
the one-year eligibility period, former spouse coverage may not 
be established thereafter.  The former spouse is not eligible 
for annuity payments upon the member’s death even though a 
member fails to notify the Defense Finance and Accounting 
Service-Cleveland Center (DFAS)-CL) of the divorce and continues 
to pay SBP premiums afterwards.
The parties divorced on 30 Jun 87 and the divorce decree was 
silent on the SBP.  The service member elected spouse only RCSBP 
coverage based on full retired pay (immediate option) under the 
RCSBP on 26 Sep 79 after becoming eligible to receive retired 
pay except for attaining age 60.  He began receiving retired pay 
effective 21 Feb 98, his 60th birthday.  There is no evidence the 
decedent submitted a valid election to voluntarily change spouse 
to former spouse coverage during the required time following 
their divorce as the law requires.  The retired pay data system 
at DFAS-CL continued to reflect the applicant’s name as the 
eligible spouse beneficiary.  SBP premiums were deducted from 
the decedent’s retired pay until his 28 Jun 11 death.  There was 
no evidence either party remarried, and accordingly there is no 
competing claimant.

Despite the decedent’s failure to submit a valid former spouse 
election change, he did not request coverage for the applicant 
be terminated following their divorce.  His willingness to 
accept a reduction in his retired pay, even though he had no 
eligible spouse beneficiary for over 12 years, is indicative of 
his intent for the applicant to be eligible for his RCSBP. 

A complete copy of the DPFFF evaluation is at Exhibit B.  


APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

In an affidavit dated 15 May 14, the applicant under oath states 
she is not married.

The applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit E.    


THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice warranting 
relief.  We note the Office of Primary Responsibility (OPR) 
states that absent a competing claimant, they recommend granting 
the requested relief.  As such, we find the death certificate 
provided by the applicant sufficient to conclude that the 
decedent was not married at the time of his death.  We note the 
divorce decree is silent on SBP.  However, we find the 
decedent’s hand-written statement dated 11 Apr 87, agreeing to 
maintain insurance on the applicant coupled with the fact he 
continued making SBP premium payments for over 12 years without 
an eligible spouse beneficiary sufficient to conclude it was his 
intent to have the applicant as his SBP beneficiary.  Therefore, 
we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force OPR and adopt 
the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the 
applicant has been the victim of an error or an injustice.  
Accordingly, we recommend the decedent’s record be corrected as 
indicated below. 


THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:

The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air 
Force relating to DECEDENT be corrected to show that on 1 Jul 
87, he elected to change his RCSBP spouse coverage to former 
spouse coverage based on full retired pay, naming the APPLICANT 
as the former spouse beneficiary, contingent upon recoupment of 
any applicable premiums.     


The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2013-05614 in Executive Session on 29 Dec 14 under the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603:
	 , Panel Chair
	 , Member
	 , Member

 
All members voted to correct the records as recommended.  The 
following documentary evidence in AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2013-
05614 was considered:

	Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 1 Dec 13, w/atchs.
	Exhibit B.  Memorandum, AFPC/DPFFF, dated 24 Apr 14.
	Exhibit C.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 8 May 14.  
	Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 8 May 14.  
	Exhibit E.  Affidavit, Applicant, dated 15 May 14.   

						


 

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00167

    Original file (BC 2014 00167.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00167 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: She be designated as the former spouse beneficiary under the Survivor’s Benefit Plan (SBP). There is no evidence of Air Force error in this case and absent a competing claimant, DPFFF recommends the decedent’s record be corrected to reflect that on...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04626

    Original file (BC-2012-04626.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    ________________________________________________________________ THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPFFF recommends approval, stating, in part, there is no evidence of Air Force error in this case and absent a competing claimant, DPFFF recommends the decedent's record be corrected to reflect on 1 Feb 94, he elected to change SBP spouse to former spouse coverage based on full retired pay, naming the applicant as the former spouse beneficiary. Considering the applicant failed to execute a deemed...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05676

    Original file (BC 2013 05676.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05676 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: She be designated the beneficiary for her former spouse’s Survivor’s Benefit Plan (SBP). As such, we find the death certificate provided by the applicant sufficient to conclude that the decedent was not married at the time of his death. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03731

    Original file (BC 2013 03731.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The decedent elected spouse and child SBP coverage based on a reduced level of retired pay prior to his 1 Jul 95 retirement. There is no evidence either party submitted a valid election to change spouse to former spouse coverage within the first year following their divorce as the law requires. The complete DPFFF evaluation is at Exhibit F. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant acknowledges the change to the advisory opinion to recommend the decedent’s record...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00338

    Original file (BC 2014 00338.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00338 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: She be designated as the former spouse beneficiary under the Survivor’s Benefit Plan (SBP). Second, we note that the divorce decree submitted by the applicant was not final, as it was not executed by both parties and the court. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00195

    Original file (BC 2014 00195.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: In a two-page brief, through counsel, the applicant contends the following: Her former spouse intended for her to be the SBP beneficiary from the date of their divorce on 18 May 99, to the date of his death. The Board should consider her untimely application in the interest of justice because she did not discover the error until after the death of her former spouse. There is no evidence of Air Force error in this case and absent a competing claimant, we recommend...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03921

    Original file (BC 2013 03921.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPFFF recommends granting relief. The parties divorced on 2 Dec 04, and in the Agreement, incorporated in the divorce decree, the decedent agreed to pay SBP premiums currently in place for the benefit of the applicant. SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON JUL 2 2 2015 MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS (AFBCMR) SUBJECT: AFBCMR Docket Number: BC-2013-03921 I have carefully reviewed the AFBMCR application...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00704

    Original file (BC 2014 00704.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He submitted DD Form 1882, for former spouse and child coverage; however, DFAS-CL did not honor the election because it was not received until after the one-year eligibility period. However, while the applicant contends the election for former spouse coverage was made within the required time, no evidence has been provided, to our satisfaction, that she or the deceased former member submitted a valid former spouse election during the first year following their divorce. THE BOARD DETERMINES...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04943

    Original file (BC-2012-04943.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The parties divorced on 5 Jun 98, and in the Child Custody Marital Dissolution Agreement, incorporated in the divorce decree, the member agreed the applicant would receive survivor benefits from his military retirement. There is no evidence of Air Force error, and absent a competing claimant, we recommend the member's record be corrected to reflect that he elected to change SBP spouse to former spouse coverage based on full retired pay and named the applicant as the eligible former spouse...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-01181

    Original file (BC-2013-01181.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The parties divorced on 23 Jan 1987, and the divorce decree ordered the conversion of the SBP annuity. However, we also note that federal law makes the election unavailable when the deemed election is not timely effected, and no evidence has been presented which shows a deemed election was made within the one-year time period mandated by the law. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBC, dated 31 Oct 2013, w/atch.